Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 2389 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-940XM - 455 vs 440 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i7-940XM - 35 vs 55 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
455
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Celeron |
Clarksfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |