Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 1260 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i7-940XM - 68 vs 66 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-940XM - 53 vs 55 Watts
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
68
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Celeron |
Clarksfield | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 53 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |