Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 1044 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 5 than Core i7-940XM - 184 vs 182 FPS
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4658 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | FX |
Clarksfield | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |