Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 3602 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 9% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-940XM - 168 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 12 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$124.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $124.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4811 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |