Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3304 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i7-940XM - 149 vs 144 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19041 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |