Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 2860 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-940XM - 202 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 12 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$195
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |