Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3602 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 23% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-940XM - 132 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 16 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6878 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i7 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |