Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 1730 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Stray than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 188 vs 182 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $78.02 vs $165.86
- Up to 51% better value when playing Stray than Core i5-11600KF - $0.43 vs $0.88 per FPS
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
48%
Price, $
$165.86
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12784 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
182
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12785 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |