Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF and the cheaper Core i3-10105F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Fortnite than Core i3-10105F - 237 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $85.13 vs $165.86
- Up to 46% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i5-11600KF - $0.38 vs $0.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
237
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
54%
Price, $
$165.86
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3643 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
227
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3642 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |