Key Differences
In short — Core i3-2100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-2100 is 372 days older than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield V than FX-6200 - 207 vs 206 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i3-2100 - $42.85 vs $49.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i3-2100 - $0.21 vs $0.24 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2100 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |