Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1115G4 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1115G4 is 3110 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1115G4
- Performs up to 18% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-6200 - 134 vs 114 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-1115G4 - 6 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1115G4 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |