Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 1772 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-7600K - $42.85 vs $170.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-7600K - $0.27 vs $0.96 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 13% better in No Man's Sky than FX-6200 - 177 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 91 vs 125 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Buy for $170 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |