Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 2782 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 93% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 17 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 40% better in HITMAN 2 than Celeron 847 - 144 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 56 vs 2 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon W |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 3647 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 28 |
| 2 | Threads | 56 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 255 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
