Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4710HQ outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4710HQ is 1017 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-4710HQ - 17 vs 47 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4710HQ
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron 847 - 125 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 8 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Mobile • Apr 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i7-4710HQ |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 47 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |