Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3076 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Athlon 3000G - 17 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 16% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron 847 - 169 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 4 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
