Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4702HQ outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4702HQ is 708 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-4702HQ - 17 vs 37 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4702HQ
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than Celeron 847 - 266 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 8 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Core i7-4702HQ
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i7-4702HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | May 27th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 37 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
