Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 1128 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160T - 17 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 19% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron 847 - 118 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 4 vs 2 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
