Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2202 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron 847 - 123 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 64 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | EPYC |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
