Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3550H is 2758 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3550H - 17 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron 847 - 229 vs 218 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 8 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Ryzen 5 3550H
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3550H |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
