Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4710HQ outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4710HQ is 160 days older than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4710HQ
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 164 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 47 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4710HQ
Mobile • Apr 1st, 2014
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4710HQ | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 135 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
