Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 1253 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 258 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 48 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $78.02 vs $1300.0
- Up to 93% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $0.34 vs $5.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 140 vs 280 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
258
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.04/FPS
6%
Price, $
$1300
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6480 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
232
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6481 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
48 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |