Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 771 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 48 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 5% better in Minecraft than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 732 vs 700 FPS
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $74.79 vs $1244.02
- Up to 94% better value when playing Minecraft than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $0.1 vs $1.78 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $1,244.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
732
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $74.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |