Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 477 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 2% better in God of War than Core i3-10105F - 178 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $83.24 vs $1234.02
- Up to 93% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $0.48 vs $6.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.93/FPS
6%
Price, $
$1234.02
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,234.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
175
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$83.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $83.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |