Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9940X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 879 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9940X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $98.18 vs $970.7
- Up to 90% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-9940X - $0.8 vs $7.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 28 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
Buy for $970.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i9-9940X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |