Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2979 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 21% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-6200 - 129 vs 107 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - $42.85 vs $94.99
- Up to 46% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 3 3100 - $0.4 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4656 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4655 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |