Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1492 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 10% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $178.02 vs $197.65
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 32% better in War Thunder than FX-8320E - 172 vs 130 FPS
- Up to 16% better value when playing War Thunder than FX-8320E - $1.15 vs $1.37 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 24 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15294 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.65
90%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15295 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |