Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-14500 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-14500 is 3415 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i5-14500 - $178.02 vs $239.99
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14500
- Performs up to 62% better in Rust than FX-8320E - 249 vs 154 FPS
- Up to 17% better value when playing Rust than FX-8320E - $0.96 vs $1.16 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
249
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$239.99
74%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-14500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |