Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 3415 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $178.02 vs $209.99
- Up to 2% better value when playing God of War than Core i5-14400F - $1.1 vs $1.12 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 16% better in God of War than FX-8320E - 188 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
98%
Price, $
$209.99
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |