Buy on Amazon
$178.02
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-7700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-7700K is 854 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - $178.02 vs $230.0
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 32% better in Rust than FX-8320E - 203 vs 154 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing Rust than FX-8320E - $1.13 vs $1.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 91 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
Core i7-7700K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$230
77%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-7700K Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.5 GHz Unlocked LGA 1151 100/200 Series 91W
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i7-7700K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i7-7700K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 91 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
