Buy on Amazon
$178.02
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 1508 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 15% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8320E - 136 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than FX-8320E - $129.99 vs $178.02
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-9600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.6 GHz Turbo unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W
Buy for $129.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i5-9600K
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
