Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 915 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 91 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-7700K - 180 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - $210.0 vs $230.0
- Up to 9% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-7700K - $1.17 vs $1.29 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700K - 12 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |