Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100 is 3415 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100
- Performs up to 26% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8320E - 211 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than FX-8320E - $139.99 vs $178.02
- Up to 38% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8320E - $0.66 vs $1.07 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
211
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i3-14100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |