Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

FX-8320E vs Core i9-10900F

FX-8320E vs Core i9-10900F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

AMD FX-8320E

3.2 GHz | 8-core

AMD FX-8320E Logo
AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK

Buy for $178.02 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 34 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900F

2.8 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W

Buy for $225 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 39 minutes ago

AMD FX-8320E

3.2 GHz | 8-core

AMD FX-8320E Logo
AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK

Buy for $178.02 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 34 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900F

2.8 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W

Buy for $225 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 39 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2067 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.

Advantages of AMD FX-8320E

  • Up to 21% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $178.02 vs $225.0
  • Up to 8% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-10900F - $1.24 vs $1.35 per FPS

Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F

  • Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-8320E - 167 vs 143 FPS
  • Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 20 vs 8 threads
This is a free version of Battlefield 2042.
Battlefield 2042

Battlefield 2042

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD FX-8320E Logo
FX-8320E

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014


FPS

143

85%

Value, $/FPS

$1.24/FPS

100%

Price, $

$178.02

100%

Value Winner

AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK

Buy for $178.02 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 34 minutes ago

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Core i9-10900F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

167

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1.35/FPS

91%

Price, $

$225

79%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W

Buy for $225 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 39 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD FX-8320E Logo
FX-8320E

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Core i9-10900F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD FX-8320E Logo
FX-8320E

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014


Single-Core

443

26%

Multi-Core

1680

19%

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Core i9-10900F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1676

100%

Multi-Core

8426

100%

AMD FX-8320E Logo

AMD FX-8320E

vs
Intel Core i9-10900F Logo

Intel Core i9-10900F

Sep 2nd, 2014Release Date
Apr 30th, 2020
FXCollectionCore i9
VisheraCodenameComet Lake
AMD Socket AM3+SocketIntel Socket 1200
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
8Cores
10
8Threads
20
3.2 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.8 GHz
4.0 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.2 GHz
95 WTDP
65 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
16.0xMultiplier
28.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
Yes
OverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.