Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2387 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Dead Space than FX-8320E - 159 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than FX-8320E - $165.86 vs $178.02
- Up to 16% better value when playing Dead Space than FX-8320E - $1.04 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 12 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$165.86
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |