Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 1325 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 4% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - $178.02 vs $185.0
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-8320E - 174 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-8320E - $1.06 vs $1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2641 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
96%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2642 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |