Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $185.0 vs $225.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-10900F - $0.72 vs $0.82 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen 7 2700 - 274 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 20 vs 16 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |