Buy on Amazon
$217.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 808 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Borderlands 3 than Ryzen 5 2400G - 227 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $135.0 vs $217.99
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $217.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73823 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Processor with Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics - YD2400C5FBBOX
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73824 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
1057
63.06682577565632%
Multi-Core
3294
39.093282696415855%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
