Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700K is 333 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - $178.02 vs $180.0
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than FX-8320E - 122 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing Elden Ring than FX-8320E - $1.48 vs $1.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 91 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18432 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$180
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18433 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |