Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2558 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $100.0 vs $225.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-10900F - $0.69 vs $1.35 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 16% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-6350 - 167 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 20 vs 6 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FD6350FRHKBOX FX-6350 FX-Series 6-Core Black Edition
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5777 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5777 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 |
| Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 6 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
