Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 3400G - 136 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $98.15 vs $225.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900F - $0.78 vs $1.65 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13731 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
126
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13732 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |