Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1430 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 39% better in League of Legends than Core i7-6800K - 206 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6800K - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $114.0 vs $222.99
- Up to 30% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i9-10900F - $0.69 vs $0.98 per FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
70.40816326530613%
Price, $
$222.99
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $222.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
148
71.84466019417476%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$114
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $114 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 269 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1224
73.0310262529833%
Multi-Core
5661
67.18490386897697%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |