Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Apex Legends than Core i7-3770 - 285 vs 262 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $122.03 vs $225.0
- Up to 41% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i9-10900F - $0.47 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13563 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
262
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$122.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $122.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13562 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |