Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 3537 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - $122.03 vs $249.99
- Up to 38% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-12700F - $0.57 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 27% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-3770 - 272 vs 215 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 20 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
215
79%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$122.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $122.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11123 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
272
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
61%
Price, $
$249.99
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $249.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |