Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 912 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 36% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen 5 3400G - 229 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - $98.15 vs $249.99
- Up to 47% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-12700F - $0.58 vs $1.09 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
229
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
53%
Price, $
$249.99
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $249.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3255 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
168
73%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3256 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |