Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Core i7-6700T - 280 vs 271 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $99.9 vs $225.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-10900F - $0.37 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15175 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
271
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |