Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 6 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 3100 - 112 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $94.99 vs $225.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900F - $0.88 vs $2.01 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18601 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
108
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18601 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |