Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 62 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - $42.85 vs $175.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-3770K - $0.48 vs $1.86 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 6% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6200 - 94 vs 89 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14327 minutes ago
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14327 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |