Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 1710 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 4% better in Starfield than Celeron G3930T - 47 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - $39.0 vs $175.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-3770K - $0.87 vs $3.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 35 vs 77 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2700 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2700 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |