Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 1220 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 3% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G3900 - 176 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - $39.9 vs $175.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i7-3770K - $0.23 vs $0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 51 vs 77 Watts
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3127 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
171
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |