Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 1405 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600X - $39.9 vs $190.0
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 26% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G3900 - 225 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75488 minutes ago
Buy for $190 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75489 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |